The best instance I can think of to illustrate this point is flags. Each nation in the planet has a specific banner, as we know. We use these symbols (which are often simple bars of color, and sometimes shapes. The American flag is pretty gaudy in comparison...) to identify ourselves as members of a certain country. These icons grow to be very meaningful to the citizens of a country. We love our flag so much we wave it at sorting events, display it in our offices, we even make it into underpants.
Our world is in color; unless there are only two prisms in your eye(this CAN happen, actually) you see the world in color, so why not express yourself in color as well? I think this is where the comics have a distinct advantage over alphabetic text. I can tell you that this apple is red. I can attempt to describe the water droplets glistening on the skin of it, but I cannot, with text, show you this apple. It's impossible.

With a picture of it, drawn as a comic or imported as a .jpg, I can express to you exactly what I mean when I say, "The apple is red,".
So why the resistance? Why do we feel, even now that comics are a lesser art form? (I'm sorry. This is the stigma. This is going to remain the stigma.) Do they not let the writer conversation a deeper, more connected visualization of the story? Of course they do.
"Why do we feel, even now that comics are a lesser art form?" I find this question interesting. While I agree with your point that comics are underrated, I have to think about this question...A picture is worth a thousand words...right? But isn't there something impressive in being able to describe something in significantly less words? There is something special in the ability to put the image in someone's minds only using words as opposed to letting a picture do it for you. So...in a way...comics may seem lazy....I mean, I completely think that comics are underrated...but it's something to think about.
ReplyDelete